Tagged with feminism RSS

A note on BDSM and Fifty Shades of Grey

What I find most interesting about the number of essays on Fifty Shades of Grey is that most of the reviewers have never been in a BDSM relationship, nor do they seem to have friends who are in/have been in BDSM relationships. You can’t theorize about and reduce the extremely complicated sexual and psychological feelings in a bondage and discipline, dominance and submission, sadism and masochism relationship to something as simple as “his mother didn’t love him” or “women don’t really like having power” (and I’m talking to you, Katie Roiphe). Some of the people who are most in touch with their own psychology (and I won’t say they’re “psychologically healthy,” because I don’t think that exists; there is no norm) are into BDSM relationships.

Anyway. I just wanted to say what has, perhaps, already been said, but to echo it because I have more than one friend who is into BDSM. And you’d never know it by looking at these friends.

Denying other people the ability to affirm you or destroy you is a powerful thing, something that people fear losing. And with Hannah reserving that power to herself in the text of Girls, it’s not surprising that people would respond to that display of confidence by attempting to deny it any beachhead in the world outside it. People don’t give up power easily, particularly not their power to judge women who they’ve been taught are in need of their evaluation and correction and elevation that can only come from outside them. I don’t know why I thought Hannah Hovarth and Lena Dunham might escape that fate, except for the fact that I badly wanted them to.

Think Progress: “Lena Dunham’s Looks, the Misogyny of the ‘Girls’ Backlash, and Staying In Your Assigned Story” (via shorterexcerpts)

I haven’t even caught up on all of the episodes of this season’s Girls yet, but despite its issues with race, I want to watch Girls for exactly the reason why men want to criticize it and judge Hannah/Lena.

(via shorterexcerpts)

Worst Book(s) I’ve Read in the Last Year

We’re going to have to stretch this to the last year plus a few months, because I need to tell you that despite the fact that in the last twelve/thirteen months I have read a terrible, terribly-written book (The Chocolate Cupid Killings) in a terrible mystery series—which, really, is so bad that I cannot remember whether I’ve read any of the books because they pass through me like White Castle—it does not compare to Emily Giffin’s Something Borrowed and its sequel, Something Blue. Seriously. It’s not that Emily Giffin’s a terrible writer, or that her books are so terribly predictable that I knew they’d adapt them for a romantic comedy before I really knew. (This is true for the latter.) Her books are terrible because she continually hates on women’s bodies. Every single woman in these books is described not so much by her personality as by her body type, and how hard she works, but poor thing! she just can’t catch a break with her lumpy, cellulite-ridden body. And of course, this is why it is so surprising that the protagonist of the first book, Something Borrowed, manages to steal the guy away from her best friend—who has a perfect body. It’s not surprising or shocking that a friend would betray another. No! It’s surprising and shocking that a frumpy, slightly-overweight (but really, barely overweight in the grand scheme of things) friend would steal a guy/fiance from her really perfect, so-perfect-you-of-course-hate-her best friend. Anyway.

I’m sorry if my writing has gone to shit. I’ve been reading too much David Foster Wallace (and by “too much” I mean a lot, but there can never be enough), and he really makes these sort of sentences work for him, but stylistically, I can’t/don’t. And yet, I can’t stop myself right now because I don’t really care to try, nor will I rewrite these sentences because this is a blog and nobody will probably read them anyway.

Anyway. What I’m really trying to say here is that I used to not notice when women hated on other women’s bodies, and I used to take all of the judgment in, silently, and examine my own body for all its flaws and hate myself more and more. But now, I refuse to. I notice when women pick apart other women, and frankly, I don’t fucking appreciate it. Don’t read these books if you can help it. Read something else for fun.

(30-Day Book Challenge: Day #7)

  • Freddy: I can never tell, ballerina, whether you're ambitious or you just like to complain.
  • Peggy: Why can't I be both?

I want to hold onto my ‘pre-pregnancy self’ as long as possible. I like that self. I like the way people speak to her, react to her. I don’t want things to change. I have enough friends with babies to know how this works. Once you let people know you’re pregnant, you’re entered into lots of conversations about your belly, your weight, your breasts and how you plan on using them, what medications you’ll take, and why you’re right or wrong about them. I don’t want to have these conversations. I like the kinds of conversations I already have.

Aubrey Hirsch, “On Pregnancy and Privacy and Fear”

The whole thing is so, so good. I want to befriend Aubrey Hirsch.

I tend to operate on the assumption that every self-respecting woman is a feminist, and I sort of act as if they are, saying, ‘Of course you’re a feminist, too.’ Then let them make the case against it if they like. I think underneath it, all women are feminists. It’s just a matter of peeling away the layers of denial and self-protection, and all of the reasons why women back off and try to disavow their own best interests.

I find it really curious that people will always ask me, ‘When did you become a feminist?’ That doesn’t make any sense to me, because it seems to me that one is always a feminist. It’s, ‘When did you discover that you were at your core, of course, a feminist?’ I assume all other women are that way, and eventually something will happen in their lives that will make the light bulb go on. It’s just a matter of time and encouragement. And I like to think that it helps just standing up in an audience, especially of undergraduates - young women who tend to be more vulnerable and fearful of stating their opinion—and just saying, here I am—I’m a feminist and it didn’t destroy my life. Quite the contrary, everything good that’s ever happened to me came from that starting point of declaring my feminist belief.

Susan Faludi, 1993 interview with The Progressive

I keep referencing this Susan Faludi interview, and it’s good to find it it alone. I saw her speak on WKU’s campus just after Stiffed came out, somewhere around 2000, and it never fails to amaze me that I was first introduced to her as a freshman in college. At the time, I never realized how pronounced my own feminist views would become (and rightly so).

annaetc:

barackobama:

think-progress:

31 Republican men voted against the Violence Against Women Act in the Senate today. All 5 Republican women voted for it. 

Today in sad phrases: “Voted against the Violence Against Women Act.”

Today in sadder phrases: “All 5 Republican women.”

annaetc:

barackobama:

think-progress:

31 Republican men voted against the Violence Against Women Act in the Senate today. All 5 Republican women voted for it. 

Today in sad phrases: “Voted against the Violence Against Women Act.”

Today in sadder phrases: “All 5 Republican women.”

At the root of my indifference was a belief that, adorable or not, babies were trouble. They were the thing that kept you from doing what you actually wanted to do with your hours, your days, your weeks, your life. From traveling and writing and perfecting your yoga postures or collecting fragile figurines, from making love at all hours of the day or lounging around drinking tea or wine with a good book in hand. Babies cried and caterwauled, they fussed and fidgeted, they demanded without compunction and ruthlessly denied those charged with their care even the most reasonable requests: to shower, to sleep, to pee in peace. I liked to shower and sleep and pee in peace. I liked my life without babies. My life was a private pleasure dome of self-fulfillment, of doing what I wanted to do when I felt like doing it—or not.

Which is how I got the shock of my life when, at thirty-five, I had a baby of my own and loved him so entirely I couldn’t honestly remember what I thought my purpose had been on this earth before he came along.

To conceive him had been an essentially intellectual decision. It wasn’t that my husband and I particularly wanted to have a baby at that moment in our lives; it was that we’d grimly realized I was approaching an age that, as one not-so-cheerful article from a women’s magazine put it, if I wanted to naturally conceive a baby, I’d “better run, not walk, to the exit.”

My husband and I had talked for years about becoming parents, and we were in perfect agreement with each other on the subject. Neither of us was in a hurry to have a baby, and yet there wasn’t any doubt that someday we would. Parenthood, we agreed, is one of the few truly profound experiences life offers, and neither of us, regardless of our grave and genuine doubts, was willing to miss out. What if we don’t like the baby? we wondered out loud to each other. What if the baby bores us to tears or destroys our budding artistic careers?—his, as a filmmaker, mine, as a writer. We imagined, as the years rolled by, that our desire for the two children we planned to have would move from the theoretical realm and into the actual. That we would wake up one morning with the mad and certain desire to relinquish our lives as we knew them to the sweet bonds of parenthood.

That never happened. In the end, we simply reached for each other and hoped we weren’t making the biggest mistake of our lives.

Cheryl Strayed, “Baby Weight”

Always relevant, especially for me now, at the age of 30.

Spelling

structureandstyle:

My daughter plays on the floor
with plastic letters,
red, blue & hard yellow,
learning how to spell,
spelling,
how to make spells.

I wonder how many women
denied themselves daughters,
closed themselves in rooms,
drew the curtains
so they could mainline words.

A child is not a poem,
a poem is not a child.
there is no either/or.
However.

I return to the story
of the woman caught in the war
& in labour, her thighs tied
together by the enemy
so she could not give birth.

Ancestress: the burning witch,
her mouth covered by leather
to strangle words.

A word after a word
after a word is power.

At the point where language falls away
from the hot bones, at the point
where the rock breaks open and darkness
flows out of it like blood, at
the melting point of granite
when the bones know
they are hollow & the word
splits & doubles & speaks
the truth & the body
itself becomes a mouth.

This is a metaphor.

How do you learn to spell?
Blood, sky & the sun,
your own name first,
your first naming, your first name,
your first word.

—Margaret Atwood

Lately I’ve been thinking about what it means to be a woman and a writer, both. Either is an exhausting job, and to be both seems impossible. And I keep thinking about Adrienne Rich, who supposedly argued in Of Woman Born that until a woman can walk away from a pregnancy like a man can, we should be allowed reproductive rights. (I haven’t read Of Woman Born yet.) Or Judith Ortiz Cofer, who writes in “The Woman Who Slept with One Eye Open” that she started “going to bed when [her] daughter did and rising at 5:00 a.m.” every morning to write. Motherhood seems so impossible, especially if you’re a writer.

But here is Atwood, writing ”A child is not a poem,/a poem is not a child./there is no either/or.” She says everything I suspect but cannot articulate, and she says it beautifully. I think for me, I’ll have to make a decision eventually, and I’ll have to make it work: “there is no either/or.”

Again, poetry says what I cannot.

-R

Mlle Hazelwood

Reader & Writer, Master of Fine Arts, Collaborator on Structure and Style, a new poetry blog.

 

Gratuitous Pictures

Summer Reading 2012

Books Read in 2012

Catching Up on Classics

(What I'm) Reading.am